Translate

Πέμπτη, 12 Απριλίου 2018

ΠΑΝΑΓΙΩΤΗΣ ΝΟΥΝΗΣ, ΤΟ ΑΣΤΥΝΟΜΙΚΟ ΚΑΙ ΔΙΚΑΣΤΙΚΟ ΣΥΣΤΗΜΑ «ΜΠΑΖΕΙ ΝΕΡΑ» ΕΞ ΑΙΤΙΑΣ ΤΗΣ ΜΥΘΟΠΛΑΣΙΑΣ ΤΗΣ ΜΝΗΜΗΣ



ΤΟ ΑΣΤΥΝΟΜΙΚΟ ΚΑΙ ΔΙΚΑΣΤΙΚΟ ΣΥΣΤΗΜΑ «ΜΠΑΖΕΙ ΝΕΡΑ» ΕΞ ΑΙΤΙΑΣ ΤΗΣ ΜΥΘΟΠΛΑΣΙΑΣ ΤΗΣ ΜΝΗΜΗΣ

Του Παναγιώτη Π. Νούνη

Προτείνω να παρακολουθήσετε μια δραματική υπόθεση, ώστε να προβληματιστείτε σε βάθος για την υπόθεση που συγκλονίζει το παγκύπριο περί της μακαριστής Έλενας Φραντζή και τον Κληρικό θετό πατέρα της.

Μια συγκλονιστική υπόθεση για σεξουαλικής φύσεως κακοποίηση, βιασμόν γυναικός, όπου το θύμα του βιασμού, ως αψευδής και αυτόπτης μάρτυρας κατεδίκασε (μαζί με την Αστυνομία τους Ενόρκους και το Δικαστήριο) σχεδόν 12 ολόκληρα χρόνια έναν αθώο άνθρωπο στην φυλακή.

Και εξ όσον φαίνεται σύμφωνα με το παγκόσμιο παγιωμένο και προβληματικό δικαστικό σύστημα οι αθώοι στις φυλακές είναι σωρηδόν, εξ αιτίας της μυθοπλασίας της μνήμης ούκ ολίγων αυτοπτών μαρτύρων.

Η εν λόγω ιστορία έρχεται να ενισχύσει την προσωπική μας εκτίμηση και θεωρία ότι: 

πρώτον, οι αναμνήσεις της μακαριστής ήτο προϊόν μυθοπλασίας της μνήμης της, και κατά δεύτερον, μιά στυγνή συκοφαντική δυσφήμιση κατά του εν λόγω κληρικού πατέρα της.

Δείτε το δημοσιογραφικό ντοκουμέντο.

Του Παναγιώτη Π. Νούνη



RONALD COTTON (Burlington, North Carolina)

Factual Background. In two separate incidents in July 1984, an assailant broke into an apartment, severed phone wires, sexually assaulted a woman, and searched through her belongings, taking money and other items.

On August 1, 1984, Ronald Cotton was arrested for the rapes. In January 1985, Cotton was convicted by a jury of one count of rape and one count of burglary. In a second trial, in November 1987, Cotton was convicted of both rapes and two counts of burglary. An Alamance County Superior Court sentenced Cotton to life plus 54 years.

Prosecutor's evidence at trial. Cotton's alibi was supported by family members. The jury was not allowed to hear evidence that the second victim failed to pick Cotton out of either a photo array or a police lineup. The prosecution based on its case on several points:
A photo identification was made by one of the victims.
A police lineup identification was made by one of the victims.
A flashlight in Cotton's home resembled the one used by the assailant.

Rubber from Cotton's tennis shoe was consistent with rubber found at one of the crime scenes.

Postconviction challenges. Cotton's attorney filed an appeal. The North Carolina Supreme Court overturned the conviction because the second victim had picked another man out of the lineup and the trial court did not allow this evidence to be heard by the jury.

In November 1987, Cotton was retried, this time for both rapes. The second victim had decided that Cotton was the assailant. Before the second trial, a man in prison, who had been convicted for crimes similar to these assaults, stated to another inmate that he had committed Cotton's crimes. The superior court judge refused to allow this information into evidence, and Cotton was convicted of both rapes and sentenced to life.

The next year Cotton's apellate defender filed a brief that did not argue the failure to admit the second suspect's confession. The conviction was affirmed. In 1994 two new lawyers, at the request of the chief appellate defender, took over Cotton's defense. They filed a motion for appropriate relief on the grounds of inadequate appeal counsel. They also filed a motion for DNA testing that was granted in October 1994. In the spring of 1995, the Burlington Police Department turned over all evidence that contained the assailant's semen for DNA testing.

DNA Results. The samples from one victim were too deteriorated to be conclusive, but the samples from the other victim's vagainal swab and underwear were submitted to PCR testing and showed no match to Cotton. At the defense attorney's request, the results were sent to the State Bureau of Investigation's DNA data base containing the DNA patterns of convicted, violent felons in North Carolina prisons. The state's data base showed a match with the convict who had earlier confessed to the crime.

Conclusion. After Cotton's attorneys received the DNA test results in May 1995, they contacted the district attorney, who joined the defense attorneys in the motion to dismiss the charges. On June 30, 1995, Cotton was officially cleared of all charges and released fron prison. In July 1995. the governor of North Carolina officially pardoned Cotton, making him eligible for $5,000 compensation from the state. Cotton had served 10 1/2 years of his sentence.